Betekenis van:
german capital

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. German banks had to adapt to the new capital requirements by 30 June 1993.
2. German banks had to adapt to the new capital requirements by 30 June 1993. The own funds cushion of many Landesbanks, including WestLB, was already comparatively weak before transposal of the Solvency Ratio Directive into German law.
3. The German authorities state that the contribution was made in accordance with the agreement and was recognised for supervisory purposes as liable equity capital of NordLB.
4. The fact that the German supervisory authority treated the transfer as a reserve suggests that the capital made available is more akin to share capital than to a silent partnership contribution.
5. According to information provided by the German authorities, DEM 1500 million (EUR 770 million) was needed for this purpose at the time when the new capital requirements entered into force.
6. Under German company law, rather, all companies irrespective of their legal form could be set up for a limited period or it could be agreed that a contribution could be withdrawn subject to notice, which did not stand in the way of its recognition as core capital under German banking supervision law.
7. At the beginning of the 1990s, a further increase in HLB's equity capital was urgently required in view of the fourth amendment to the German Banking Act (‘KWG’) since HLB would have otherwise failed to comply with the new capital requirements laid down.
8. Under German banking supervision law, silent partnership contributions had been recognised even before 1998 as core capital without any limitation as to amount, and under international banking supervision law too, perpetual silent partnership contributions had been recognised as core capital since the ‘Sydney Declaration’ in October 1998.
9. At the end of 2000 and in 2001, SNCB increased the capital of its German subsidiary (ex-Bahntrans) with a cash contribution of EUR 17,5 million and by converting short-term loans from SNCB amounting to EUR 55 million into capital.
10. On the other hand, in the light of the exceptional capital requirements of credit institutions in the EU laid down by the Solvency Directive, a capital injection of some DEM 1300 million in one of the largest German all-purpose banks must not be regarded as completely alien to any normal business decision.
11. On 30 June 1993, when the German credit institutions had to comply with the new capital requirements set by the Own Funds Directive and the Solvency Ratio Directive, the group's solvency ratio (including Wfa's capital requirements), calculated on the basis of the new provisions, was 9 %, i.e. 1 percentage point above the minimum level.
12. During the implementation of the restructuring plan LBBW will, up to 31 December 2012, only service subordinated capital or only avoid a participation in the losses of the subordinated capital in so far as it is obliged to do this without releasing reserves in accordance with section 340 et seq. HGB (German Commercial Code).
13. On the other hand, in the light of the exceptional capital requirements of credit institutions in the EU laid down by the Solvency Directive, a capital injection of some DEM 1500 million in one of the largest German all-purpose banks must not be regarded as completely alien to any normal business decision. Moreover, where an investment involves a large volume of assets, this suggests a similarity with share capital.
14. Moreover, the measure does not seem to comply with the nature and logic of the German tax system as Germany has not demonstrated why VCCs would be particularly affected by the restriction on the exploitation of tax losses when they invest in TEs and not when they carry out the same activity of providing capital to other companies such as partnerships which might also have difficulties in accessing risk capital (notably young innovative companies).
15. On 30 June 1993, when the German credit institutions had to comply with the new capital requirements set by the Own Funds Directive and the Solvency Ratio Directive, the group's solvency ratio (including Wfa's capital requirements), calculated on the basis of the new provisions, was 9 %, i.e. 1 percentage point above the minimum level. (The original own funds accounted for 6,3 percentage points, additional own funds for 2,7 percentage points.)